翻刻
《割書：私》依怙剰延徳二年十月下旬彼職上表同廿七日御手
代会其外至御掃除神事等悉令怠給之条未曽有事
也一社愁訴何事如也哉彼重則は不顧神慮不恐
叡慮蔑社官欲令還補本官職而捧三間陳状雖注
勅裁依令神事闕如被弃破畢同三年五月下旬に
重則父子蒙 勅勘之旨任社例永被処重科之訖や因茲
氏人重秋《振り仮名： ｜之｜も[朱]》召出同六月二日忝被補権祝同十二日任正祝同
子息重賢は被補沢田祝加之数度御奉尽問答之
旨趣具奥記置条之事
延徳三年六月廿七日 保元《割書：判》《割書： ｜尾張守[朱]》
光平 《割書： ｜越前守[朱]》 久種 《割書： ｜山城守[朱]》
清承《割書：判》《割書： ｜河内守[朱]》 保延 《割書：左京進[朱]｜伊豆守[朱]》
重直《割書：判》《割書： ｜宮内少輔[朱]》
宗幸《割書：同》《割書： ｜越中守[朱]》
清職《割書：同》《割書： ｜遠江守[朱]》
保兼《割書：同》《割書： ｜左馬助[朱]》
成顕《割書：同》《割書： ｜豊後守[朱]》
氏治《割書：同》《割書：淡路守[朱]｜民部丞[朱]》
現代語訳
【私意（朱書：「私」）】の依怙（えこ）によって、剰（あまつさ）え延徳二年（1490年）十月下旬、かの職（しき）を上表（じょうひょう）し、同二十七日の御手代会（おてしろかい）、その外、御掃除神事（おそうじしんじ）等に至るまで、悉（ことごと）く怠（おこた）らしめ給うの条（こと）、未曽有（みぞう）の事なり。一社（いっしゃ）の愁訴（しゅうそ）、何事かくの如くならんや。かの重則は、神慮（しんりょ）を顧みず、叡慮（えいりょ）を恐れず、社官（しゃかん）を蔑（ないがし）ろにして、本官職（ほんかんしょく）に還補（かんぽ）せしめんと欲し、三間陳状（さんかんちんじょう）を捧げた。しかれども勅裁（ちょくさい）に注（ちゅう）せしめながら、神事を闕如（けつじょ）せしめたることによって、棄破（きは）せしめられ畢（おわ）んぬ。同三年五月下旬に、重則父子は勅勘（ちょっかん）を蒙（こうむ）るの旨（むね）により、社例（しゃれい）に任せて永く重科（じゅうか）に処せられ訖（おわ）んぬや。これによって、氏人・重秋（朱書：「之」「も」）を召し出し、同六月二日、忝（かたじけな）くも権祝（ごんほうり）に補任（ぶにん）せられ、同十二日、正祝（しょうほうり）に任ぜられた。同子息・重賢（しげかた）は沢田祝（さわだのほうり）に補任せられた。加之（これに加えて）、数度の御奉尽（ごほうじん）の問答（もんどう）の旨趣（ししゅ）を具（つぶさ）に奥（おく）に記し置くの条（くだん）の事。
延徳三年（1491年）六月二十七日
保元（花押あり）【朱書：尾張守】
光平【朱書：越前守】 久種【朱書：山城守】
清承（花押あり）【朱書：河内守】 保延【朱書：左京進／伊豆守】
重直（花押あり）【朱書：宮内少輔】
宗幸（同）【朱書：越中守】
清職（同）【朱書：遠江守】
保兼（同）【朱書：左馬助】
成顕（同）【朱書：豊後守】
氏治（同）【朱書：淡路守／民部丞】
英語訳
Due to [his] private self-interest [note: "私" (private/personal) appears as a marginal annotation], and moreover, in the late tenth month of Entoku 2nd year (1490), he submitted a memorial relinquishing that post, and on the 27th day of the same month, he caused [participants] to be entirely neglectful of the御手代会 (oteshiro-kai, the proxy assembly), as well as the御掃除神事 (osōji shinji, the purification/cleaning ritual), and all other [shrine duties] — this was a thing utterly without precedent. Could the grievances of the entire shrine come to anything other than what they did? The said Shigenori, disregarding the will of the gods (shinryo), fearing not the imperial will (eiryo), and making light of the shrine officials (shakan), desired to be restored to his original official post, and submitted a three-part written appeal (sankan chinjō). Nevertheless, despite the matter being noted for an imperial ruling (chokusai), because he had caused the shrine rituals to fall into neglect and deficiency (ketsujо), [his appeal] was rejected and annulled. In the late fifth month of the same third year [of Entoku, 1491], Shigenori and his son incurred imperial censure (chokkan), and in accordance with shrine precedent (sharei), they were permanently subjected to severe punishment (jūka). Thereupon, the clan member Shigeak(i) [note: red annotations add "之" and "も"] was summoned forth; on the 2nd day of the 6th month of the same year, he was humbly appointed as gon-hōri (権祝, Provisional Chief Ritualist); and on the 12th day of the same month, he was appointed as shō-hōri (正祝, Principal Chief Ritualist). His son Shigeka(ta) (重賢) was appointed as the Sawada-hōri (沢田祝). In addition, the purport of the questions and answers of the numerous sessions of devoted service (gohōjin mondō) has been recorded in detail at the end [of this document].
Entoku 3rd year (1491), 6th month, 27th day
Yasumoto (花押/seal) [red: Owari-no-kami]
Mitsuhira [red: Echizen-no-kami] Hisatane [red: Yamashiro-no-kami]
Kiyotsugu (花押/seal) [red: Kawachi-no-kami] Yasunori [red: Sakyō-no-shin / Izu-no-kami]
Shigenao (花押/seal) [red: Kunai-no-shōyū]
Muneyuki (same) [red: Etchū-no-kami]
Kiyonori (same) [red: Tōtōmi-no-kami]
Yasukane (same) [red: Samanosuke]
Nariaki (same) [red: Bungo-no-kami]
Ujiharu (same) [red: Awaji-no-kami / Mimbu-no-jō]