翻刻
一大監物氏金内儀おとら女父古東市正ノ譲分
無子故余所ノ人ノ子ヲ養子トシ本家当東市正へ
不返養子お久へ被譲渡候事
一古式部大輔保睦ノ後家ハ治部大輔保庸之妹也
養子気ニ不入五石取ノキ保庸ノ息女ヲ為養
子被譲渡于今他家ニ進退之事
右之通計歟当座中覚故如此
此外
一兵部少光久叔母歟辻ノ主膳佑父へ嫁娶也一子
有之而母ニ先立死母主膳佑へ譲主膳佑他家へ
売渡也
一古兵アサノ直跡職養子京人ノ子也家領分
皆お久女へ譲大学助季倶へ嫁娶伝ハル
十五日 寄合有之織部正ト主殿頭トノ申分自
社中之口上書出来也内々扱不済故也其口上書之
現代語訳
一、大監物氏金の内儀・おとら女の父（古東市正）の譲り分について、子がないため、よそ（他所）の人の子を養子とし、本家である当東市正へ返さず、養子のお久へ譲り渡した事。
一、古式部大輔保睦の後家は、治部大輔保庸の妹である。（後家は）養子が気に入らず、五石分を取り除き、保庸の息女を養子として、（家領を）譲り渡した。今に至るまで他家が進退（管理・処分）している事。
右の通り（の事例を）おおよそ覚えている限り、このように（記した）。
この外にも——
一、兵部少輔光久の叔母（か）が、辻の主膳佑の父へ嫁いだ。一子があったが、母（妻）に先立って死んだ。母（後家）が主膳佑へ（その分を）譲ったところ、主膳佑が他家へ売り渡した事。
一、古兵衛（アサノ）の直跡職（直接の後継ぎとしての職）の養子は、京の人の子である。家の領分は皆おお久女（お久女）へ譲られ、大学助季倶へ嫁いで（その家に）伝わった（事）。
十五日、寄合（集会・協議）があった。織部正と主殿頭との間の申し分（主張・訴え）について、社中からの口上書が出来上がった。これは内々の取り扱いでは済まなかったためである。その口上書の（内容は——）
英語訳
Item: Concerning the bequest portion of the father (the late Higashi Ichisei) of Ōkemonmono Ujikane's wife, the woman Otora — because there were no children, a child from another family was adopted as an heir, and the estate was not returned to the main family (the current Higashi Ichisei), but was instead transferred to the adopted daughter, Ohisa.
Item: The widow of the late Shikibu-no-taifu Yasumutsu was the younger sister of Jibu-no-taifu Yasutomo. The widow was not pleased with the (previously designated) adopted child, removed five koku from the bequest, and instead designated Yasutomo's daughter as the adopted heir, transferring (the estate) to her. To this day, another family holds and manages it.
The above is what I recall, roughly speaking, of such cases, and I have recorded them as such.
In addition to the above——
Item: An aunt (perhaps) of Hyōbu-no-shōyū Mitsuhisa married the father of Tsuji Shuzensuke. They had one child, but the child predeceased the mother. The mother transferred (her portion) to Shuzensuke, who then sold it to another family.
Item: The adopted heir to the direct succession post (chokusekishoku) of the late Hyōe (Asano) was a child of someone from Kyoto. All of the family's landholdings were transferred to the woman Ohisa, who then married Daigakusuke Suetomo, and (the holdings) passed to that family.
The 15th day: A meeting (yoriai) was held. Concerning the dispute between Oribe-no-shō and Tonomo-no-kami, a formal written statement (kōjōgaki) from the shrine community was completed. This was because the matter could not be resolved through private mediation. (The contents of) that written statement (follow——)