翻刻
右之通ニ而双方和睦被仰付且又神主ゟ
氏神社祝迄社職料之給田被附下置于
今社家其通相守罷在候尤松下森
鳥居大路林梅辻冨野岡本等も氏人
十六流之内ニ而御座候此外ニ別ニ十六流有
之儀ニ而ハ無御座候事
一寛文四年以後暫之内一同致和談之候得共
次第ニ七家之内六家《割書：岡本宮内ハ｜外之》之者共格
式ヲ各別之物ニいたし度所存より何かニ付
違乱申出元禄年中衣体之儀ニ付又
違乱申夫ゟ不和ニ成候而宝永元年ニ上ニ
相見候社司廿一人之内闕有之本職之人体
勅許無之内其闕之所神役相勤候代
官役之儀ニ付惣社司氏人中と及出入
御伝奏ゟ双方え段々御尋御吟味之儀
共有之夫ゟ弥不和ニ成候而一社和順
現代語訳
右のとおり双方和睦するよう仰せ付けられ、また神主から氏神社の祝に至るまで、社職料として給田が附下し置かれ、今日に至るまで社家はその通りに守り続けております。なお、松下・森・鳥居・大路・林・梅辻・冨野・岡本らも、氏人十六流の内に含まれるものであり、これら七家・八家の外に別に十六流があるというわけではございません。
一、寛文四年（1664）以降、しばらくの間は一同が和談を保っておりましたが、次第に七家の内六家（岡本宮内は除く）の者たちが、格式を各別のものとしたいという考えから、何かにつけて異議・混乱を申し出るようになり、元禄年中（1688〜1704）には衣体（衣装・装束）の件についても、また異議を申し立て、それ以来不和となりました。そして宝永元年（1704）には、前に申し上げた社司二十一人の内に欠員が生じ、本職の人物への勅許が下りていない間、その欠員の職における神役を勤める代官役の件について、惣社司と氏人中との間で争論が生じました。御伝奏からは双方に対して段々とお尋ね・吟味がなされましたが、それ以降さらに不和が深まり、一社（賀茂社）の和順が
英語訳
In accordance with the foregoing, both parties were ordered to reconcile, and furthermore, stipends in the form of rice fields (kyūden) were granted to shrine officials from the kannushi (head priest) down to the hafuri (celebrant priests) of the ujigami shrines. To this day, the shrine families continue to abide by these arrangements. It should be noted that Matsushita, Mori, Torii, Ōji, Hayashi, Umetsuji, Tomino, and Okamoto are all themselves members of the sixteen lineages (jūroku-ryū) of the ujibito; there are no separate sixteen lineages existing apart from these families.
One item: After the fourth year of Kanbun (1664), for a time all parties maintained harmonious relations through mutual agreement. However, gradually six of the seven families (excluding Okamoto Kunai) began raising objections on various matters, stemming from their desire to distinguish their ceremonial status (kakushiki) as something separate and superior. During the Genroku era (1688–1704), they again raised objections concerning matters of ceremonial dress (itai), and from that point relations became strained. Then in the first year of Hōei (1704), a vacancy arose among the twenty-one shrine officials mentioned above, and while the imperial sanction (chokkyо̄) for the appointment of a full incumbent had not yet been granted, a dispute arose between the general shrine officials (sō-shaji) and the ujibito community regarding the role of a proxy official (daikan-yaku) who would perform the shrine duties in place of the vacant position. The Court Intermediary (denso) conducted a series of inquiries and investigations into both sides' claims, but from that point the discord deepened further, and the harmonious unity of the shrine (ichisha)...