切支丹御退治記 49巻. [8] - 翻刻

翻刻

　城之砌本丸際迄被参也
又曰三浦志摩守は出頭人尓て二月廿五六時分
　に原之城　参着也折節落城之時迄逗留なれ
　は廿七日には手勢者少も召連春当座之上使
　として参ら連たりさ連共二月廿七日に者具　
　即を着したる松平伊豆守一所に二之曲輪迄
　被参たり思ふ寄急きの出立な連は具足も漸
　々着し多る躰尓て者いたてを者希さんより
　上に阿てたりけれは見る程之者等かしかり
　けり是も何も替りたる事も無

又曰板倉内膳正子息之主水正は二月廿七日に
　は三之曲輪ゟ二之曲輪江乗込本丸際迄押寄
　鉄砲尓て責めさせ多り
又曰石貝十蔵は二月廿七日思ひ寄ら春の事な
　連は二之曲輪三之曲輪乗捕猛火致たる之間
　本丸際迄は参り多りけれ共相替事も無
又曰二月廿七日之早朝に出丸之一揆原は替明
　而二之曲輪へそ引込也左有に付て鍋島申候
　様は出曲輪を明退申之間出曲輪をは古なた
　へ取可申加登大将之伊豆守江理り申に付て足

現代語訳

城の砌、本丸際まで参られた。

また曰く、三浦志摩守は出頭人として二月二十五、六日頃に原城に参着した。折節落城の時まで逗留していたので、二十七日には手勢は少しも召し連れず、当座の上使として参られた。されども二月二十七日には具足を着した松平伊豆守と一所に二の曲輪まで参られた。思いがけず急な出立であったので、具足も漸く着したような体で、板楯は担がずに上に当てていたので、見る程の者等が失笑した。これも何も変わったことはない。

また曰く、板倉内膳正の子息主水正は二月二十七日には三の曲輪から二の曲輪へ乗り込み、本丸際まで押し寄せて鉄砲で攻めさせた。

また曰く、石貝十蔵は二月二十七日、思いがけないことであったが、二の曲輪、三の曲輪が乗っ取られて猛火となったので、本丸際までは参ったけれども、変わったことはなかった。

また曰く、二月二十七日の早朝に出丸の一揆原は明け渡して二の曲輪へと引き込んだ。そのことについて鍋島が申し上げるには、「出曲輪を明け退いたので、出曲輪はこちらが取るべきでしょうか」と大将の伊豆守に伺い申したところ、足

英語訳

during the siege, participated up to the vicinity of the main keep.

It is also recorded that Miura Shima-no-kami, as a leading figure, arrived at Hara Castle around the 25th or 26th day of the second month. Since he happened to stay until the time of the castle's fall, on the 27th day he did not bring any of his own troops but came as an immediate envoy. However, on the 27th day of the second month, he accompanied Matsudaira Izu-no-kami, who was wearing armor, to the second bailey. Because it was an unexpectedly sudden departure, he had barely managed to put on his armor, and since he was holding his shield overhead rather than carrying it properly, those who saw this were amused. This too was nothing out of the ordinary.

It is also recorded that Itakura Naizen-no-shō's son Monto-no-shō, on the 27th day of the second month, charged from the third bailey into the second bailey, pressed forward to the vicinity of the main keep, and attacked with firearms.

It is also recorded that Ishigai Jūzō, on the 27th day of the second month, though it was unexpected, since the second and third baileys had been captured and were ablaze, reached the vicinity of the main keep, but nothing particular happened.

It is also recorded that in the early morning of the 27th day of the second month, the rebels in the outer bailey surrendered and withdrew into the second bailey. Regarding this, Nabeshima reported, "Since they have abandoned and withdrawn from the outer bailey, should we take control of the outer bailey?" When he inquired of the general Izu-no-kami, [the response continues...]