翻刻
〽同年七月土方伊賀守殿領知《割書：御在所｜岩城領》被召上榊原式部大輔殿へ御預也《割書：于時｜虎之介》
八丈嶋へ遠島 《割書：伊賀守殿兄ノ子｜》土方内匠 《割書：伊賀守殿弟｜》林助之進
藤堂佐渡守殿へ御預 切腹 《割書：家老｜》川合図書 《割書：同｜》阿部長蔵
右家中仕置悪敷此度及騒動候ニ付右内匠殿川合阿部と一味ニて順々不
埒之儀有之助之進殿ニは 公儀へ右之儀訴状御差上其身は上野へ立退
被申由其起りは伊賀守殿実子無之ニ付弟助之進を家督ニも可被致所
存之処内匠殿嫡孫之義故可為家督と家来共申ニ付内匠殿江戸へ
呼下し被申候ニ付助之進殿存念ニ筋目之儀ニ候へは内匠家督尤之儀ニ候へ
共初之様子も有之儀ニ付相談も可有之事無其儀不快ニ付公儀え之訴
状被申達候品ニ付及詮義右之通之由也 有馬伊豫守殿
右領知被召上本家へ御預右は土方伊賀守殿儀ニ付林助之進殿
伊予守殿へ被参被申達候へ共然々取扱不被申親類之好みを不存仕形不埒
之至ニ付右之通被 仰付候也
〽同年八月【「月」の右に朱筆「廿八日」】殿中喧嘩 《割書：即死 堀田筑前守殿｜討手 稲葉石見守殿》
〽同年日光御普請御修復御手伝出来ニ付拝領物被仰付家来被下物
有之
《割書：銀五十枚｜時服五羽織》《割書：丹羽若狭守殿家来｜》江口三郎右衛門 《割書：銀卅枚｜時服四羽織》《割書：同上｜》《割書：種橋助之進｜ 其外三人》
同断 《割書：真田伊豆守殿家来｜》木村縫右衛門 同断 《割書：同上｜》《割書：原惣兵衛 ｜ 其外三人》
《割書：銀卅枚｜時服三羽織》《割書：内藤左京亮殿家来｜》井関内蔵介 《割書：銀廿枚｜時服三羽織》《割書：同上｜》《割書：納庄大夫 ｜ 其外三人》
同断 《割書：津軽越中守殿家来｜》津軽兵馬 同断 《割書：同上｜》《割書：田村藤大夫｜ 其外三人》
〽同十一月十一日本庄次郎左衛門殿 詰大夫被 仰付因幡守と号ス【この一行朱筆】
〽同年松平修理大夫殿両度御詮義之上領知被召上保科肥後守殿へ御預也
御子息芲之進小三郎松平日向守殿へ御預 被仰渡
修理亮儀前々御役儀をも乍相勤計方も無之書状軽キ者方え
現代語訳
○同年七月、土方伊賀守殿の領知《割書：御在所｜岩城領》が召し上げられ、榊原式部大輔殿へ御預けとなりました《割書：于時｜虎之介》
八丈島へ遠島 《割書：伊賀守殿兄ノ子｜》土方内匠 《割書：伊賀守殿弟｜》林助之進
藤堂佐渡守殿へ御預け 切腹 《割書：家老｜》川合図書 《割書：同｜》阿部長蔵
右の家中の仕置きが悪く、この度騒動に及んだため、右の内匠殿、川合、阿部と一味になって次々と不
埒な事があり、助之進殿については 公儀へ右の件を訴状でお差し上げし、その身は上野へ立ち退か
れたとのこと。その起こりは伊賀守殿に実子がないため、弟の助之進を家督にもするべきところと
思っていたが、内匠殿が嫡孫であるから家督となるべきだと家来たちが申すため、内匠殿を江戸へ
呼び下したところ、助之進殿の考えでは筋目の事であるから内匠の家督はもっともな事であるが、
最初の様子もあった事なので相談もあるべき事なのに、そのような事もなく不快であるため公儀への訴
状を申し達した次第により詮議に及び、右の通りとのことです。 有馬伊予守殿
右の領知を召し上げられ本家へ御預け。右は土方伊賀守殿の件について林助之進殿が
伊予守殿へ参って申し達したけれども、しかるべき取り扱いをされず、親類の好意を理解しない仕方が不埒の
至りであるため右の通り 仰せ付けられました。
○同年八月【「月」の右に朱筆「廿八日」】殿中喧嘩 《割書：即死 堀田筑前守殿｜討手 稲葉石見守殿》
○同年、日光御普請御修復の御手伝いが出来たことにより拝領物を仰せ付けられ、家来への下賜物
がありました
《割書：銀五十枚｜時服五羽織》《割書：丹羽若狭守殿家来｜》江口三郎右衛門 《割書：銀卅枚｜時服四羽織》《割書：同上｜》《割書：種橋助之進｜ 其外三人》
同様 《割書：真田伊豆守殿家来｜》木村縫右衛門 同様 《割書：同上｜》《割書：原惣兵衛 ｜ 其外三人》
《割書：銀卅枚｜時服三羽織》《割書：内藤左京亮殿家来｜》井関内蔵介 《割書：銀廿枚｜時服三羽織》《割書：同上｜》《割書：納庄大夫 ｜ 其外三人》
同様 《割書：津軽越中守殿家来｜》津軽兵馬 同様 《割書：同上｜》《割書：田村藤大夫｜ 其外三人》
○同十一月十一日、本庄次郎左衛門殿が詰大夫を 仰せ付けられ因幡守と号しました【この一行朱筆】
○同年、松平修理大夫殿は両度の御詮議の上、領知を召し上げられ保科肥後守殿へ御預けとなりました
御子息芲之進、小三郎は松平日向守殿へ御預けと 仰せ渡されました
修理亮の件は、前々から御役儀を勤めながらも計り方もなく、書状を軽い者方へ
英語訳
○Same year, 7th month: Lord Hijikata Iga-no-kami's domain <<annotation: residence | Iwaki domain>> was confiscated and he was placed in the custody of Lord Sakakibara Shikibu-no-taifu <<annotation: at that time | Toranosuke>>
Exile to Hachijōjima: <<annotation: son of Iga-no-kami's elder brother |>> Hijikata Takumi, <<annotation: Iga-no-kami's younger brother |>> Hayashi Sukenoshin
Placed in custody of Lord Tōdō Sado-no-kami: Seppuku <<annotation: chief retainer |>> Kawai Zusho, <<annotation: same |>> Abe Chōzō
The administration of the aforementioned household was poor, leading to this disturbance. The aforementioned Lord Takumi conspired with Kawai and Abe, leading to successive improper acts. As for Lord Sukenoshin, he submitted a petition to the authorities regarding these matters and withdrew to Kōzuke Province. The origin of this was that Lord Iga-no-kami had no legitimate heir, so he intended to make his younger brother Sukenoshin the successor. However, the retainers argued that Lord Takumi should be the successor as he was the legitimate grandson, so Lord Takumi was summoned to Edo. Lord Sukenoshin thought that while Takumi's succession was reasonable given the lineage, there should have been consultation given the initial circumstances. Since no such consultation occurred and he was displeased, he submitted a petition to the authorities, which led to this investigation and the aforementioned results. Lord Arima Iyo-no-kami:
His domain was confiscated and he was placed in custody of the main family. This was because regarding Lord Hijikata Iga-no-kami's case, Lord Hayashi Sukenoshin went to Lord Iyo-no-kami and reported the matter, but he did not provide proper assistance and his conduct in not understanding family affection was utterly improper, therefore the aforementioned punishment was decreed.
○Same year, 8th month [28th day written in red ink to the right of "month"]: Fight in the palace <<annotation: instant death: Lord Hotta Chikuzen-no-kami | attacker: Lord Inaba Iwami-no-kami>>
○Same year: Due to the completion of assistance with Nikkō construction and repairs, rewards were bestowed and gifts were given to retainers:
<<annotation: 50 pieces of silver | 5 seasonal garments and haori>> <<annotation: retainer of Lord Niwa Wakasa-no-kami |>> Eguchi Saburōemon <<annotation: 30 pieces of silver | 4 seasonal garments and haori>> <<annotation: same as above |>> <<annotation: Tanehashi Sukenoshin | and three others>>
Same: <<annotation: retainer of Lord Sanada Izu-no-kami |>> Kimura Nuiemon Same: <<annotation: same as above |>> <<annotation: Hara Sōbei | and three others>>
<<annotation: 30 pieces of silver | 3 seasonal garments and haori>> <<annotation: retainer of Lord Naitō Sakyō-no-suke |>> Iseki Kuranosuke <<annotation: 20 pieces of silver | 3 seasonal garments and haori>> <<annotation: same as above |>> <<annotation: Nōshō Taifu | and three others>>
Same: <<annotation: retainer of Lord Tsugaru Etchū-no-kami |>> Tsugaru Hyōma Same: <<annotation: same as above |>> <<annotation: Tamura Tōdayū | and three others>>
○Same year, 11th month, 11th day: Lord Honjō Jirōzaemon was appointed to Tsume-taifu and took the title Inaba-no-kami [this entire line in red ink]
○Same year: Lord Matsudaira Shuri-no-taifu, after two investigations, had his domain confiscated and was placed in the custody of Lord Hoshina Higo-no-kami. His sons Shinoshin and Kosaburō were placed in the custody of Lord Matsudaira Hyūga-no-kami, as decreed.
Regarding Shuri-no-suke's case: although he had been performing his official duties from before, he had no proper management and sent letters to persons of low standing...