翻刻
差出候様被申聞戸田七兵衛伴庄左衛門差出之
一御預所御詮議等有之節ハ品ニ寄御目付立合壱人罷出可申候御徒目付壱人同様之事 水玉
一寛政二戌十一月支配頭へ詮議者引渡者等之儀被仰渡有之 御仕置之条ニ雖出之此処へ可入
一文化三寅二月十六日最前於武具方下代相勤候豊田佐右衛門御不審之儀有之候御勘定所へ
召呼御徒目付ニ為致吟味候処相違無之申口覚書為相認御家老中へ相達候其節
御徒目付共へ夫々為取扱候
但右申口覚書ハ十太夫組物書へ申付為認佐右衛門へ為読聞ハ御徒目付共為読聞候
右佐右衛門大工町揚り屋へ被入候ニ付奈良太郎右衛門役下之者夫々罷出候様且又駕人足四人早速
罷出候様輪番庄屋へ可申付旨太郎右衛門へ相達候尤組之者両人遠見差出ス且又佐右衛門
町役所へ引渡候節懐中物脇指等書付相認町組分役へ相渡之候
一正徳四午八月十六日五分一村鋳物師共へ京都ゟ綸旨一件之儀申来僉議之儀連々留有之正徳五未八月五日鋳物師共致上京
今度綸旨頂戴罷帰今日御家老中入披見候右之一件諸事留評定留ニ連々有之
一享保十一午二月六日御代官簗八左衛門下代請込近藤甚五兵衛吟味ニ付御勘定所長屋へ差置家財符印付置候然ル処甚五兵衛親御土蔵
下番近藤半左衛門同居ニ付前々ゟ父子一所ニ罷在候ヘハ父子之諸道具共ニ符付置追而仕訳申事故御家老中へ相伺父子之道
具共ニ符付させ申候仍之半左衛門遠慮申付置候〇同廿一日右吟味之節御奉行御目付立合候得共月番ハ御用手透之節可罷出旨也
〇同廿五日同下代上野豊右衛門も吟味然ル処吉池角左衛門下代上野治左衛門与申者豊右衛門兄弟ニ而同居ニ付御法之通両人共
諸道具ニ符付豊右衛門諸道具治左衛門ニ預置候
一享保十五戌十二月十五日御側物頭茂呂多右衛門組川瀬伴七御切米手形ニ付不届之儀有之御家老中ゟ御目付へ被申聞
多右衛門方ニ而致吟味候様則多右衛門数度致吟味口書数通差出候得共度々相替儀無之多右衛門儀迷惑ニ存候間
御上ニ而御吟味被下候様同役井原丞助を以相願同廿五日町奉行大宮彦右衛門方ニ而御奉行御目付壱人ツヽ立合致
吟味候様被仰付依之伴七儀先格之通半甲為剃多右衛門組之者差添彦右衛門方へ相渡可申哉と伺候上取扱之
一同十七子十二月廿六日 御先物頭小栗九右衛門へ
太田三郎兵衛方ニ而失物有之ニ付家来関助幷町人権兵衛儀疑敷候間上へ御取揚御僉議被下候様十一月十四日其儀も連々留有之 最前相願候ニ付御僉
議被仰付度々拷問等も有之候得共右盗物之儀不存趣ニ候然共関助儀ハ御城下三り四方内ニハ不罷出様ニ可申付
旨大宮彦右衛門へ被仰付候権兵衛儀ハ当分子細も無之候ニ付出牢可申付旨申渡候就夫三郎兵衛儀右所寺仕候手掛りも無
之儀を上へ相願右之通強御僉議等も被仰付儀旁不吟味成儀申上卒忽成事不調法之仕合ニ被思召候此段三郎兵衛
へ可申聞旨被仰出候
右ニ付三郎兵衛遠慮之儀相伺候ハヽ急度自分遠慮ニハ不及指控罷在候様九右衛門へ御内意之趣申聞置候処右被仰渡之内ニ御呵と申
儀無之関助儀ニ付不吟味不調法も致方も無之と存候而遠慮伺申間敷と三郎兵衛申候由九右衛門段々取扱候得共承引不致其段御
家老中へ申達候処三郎兵衛以之外不了簡之儀候間縫殿方差図ニ候間遠慮伺候様被申聞遠慮伺候尚又九右衛門ゟ段々之
次第御目付へ申達候留委細有之 右吟味ニ付御徒目付両人掛り申付置候処廿六日御家老中へ伺之上差免之
但翌丑年正月十八日三郎兵衛御役御取揚大番入遠慮被仰付候
一文政十亥二月十一日加藤武右衛門組多田吉兵衛と申者御不審之義有之組役人同道御勘定所へ差出候様武右衛門へ申達之且又武右衛門義も同所へ致出勤候様申達
之同日評定後九半時吉兵衛呼出御不審之趣御徒目付幷組分役共へ申付為致吟味候処口書差出候ニ付其段御家老中へ相達之然処吉兵衛揚り屋へ
入置候様被申聞候ニ付武右衛門へ申達之町奉行手先之者申越夫々御徒目付へ申付為取扱候事其節組之者両人指遣ス 但右吟味之節同役不残居残
物書共ハ月番之外不残召呼口書等為相認為読聞候義も申付候事同十三日吉兵衛御ふち被召放入牢
【左上朱書き】イ
現代語訳
差し出すよう申し聞かされ、戸田七兵衛・伴庄左衛門を差し出した。
一、御預所（幕府直轄地）で御詮議等がある際は、事案によって御目付立会い一人が出向くべきである。御徒目付一人も同様のこと 水玉
一、寛政二年戌十一月、支配頭へ詮議者引き渡し者等の件が申し渡された 御仕置の条に出ているが、此処に入れるべき
一、文化三年寅二月十六日、以前武具方下代を勤めていた豊田佐右衛門に御不審の件があり、御勘定所へ召し寄せ御徒目付に審理させたところ、相違ないとの申し立て、覚書を認めて御家老中へ報告した。その節、御徒目付共へそれぞれ取り扱わせた。
ただし右申し立て覚書は十太夫組の物書に申し付けて認めさせ、佐右衛門へ読み聞かせるのは御徒目付共が読み聞かせた。
右佐右衛門を大工町揚り屋へ入れることになったため、奈良太郎右衛門配下の者がそれぞれ出向くよう、また駕籠人足四人も早速出向くよう輪番庄屋へ申し付けるべき旨を太郎右衛門へ伝達した。もちろん組の者両人を遠見に差し出す。また佐右衛門を町役所へ引き渡す際、懐中物・脇指等を書付に認めて町組分役へ渡した。
一、正徳四年午八月十六日、五分一村鋳物師共へ京都から綸旨一件の件が申し来て評議の件、連々記録あり。正徳五年未八月五日鋳物師共が上京し、今度綸旨を頂戴して帰り、今日御家老中が入って披見した。右の一件の諸事記録は評定留に連々ある。
一、享保十一年午二月六日、御代官簗八左衛門下代請込の近藤甚五兵衛の審理のため御勘定所長屋へ差し置き、家財に符印を付け置いた。然るところ甚五兵衛の親で御土蔵下番近藤半左衛門と同居しているため、以前から父子一緒にいるので父子の諸道具共に符を付け置き、追って仕分けることゆえ御家老中へ伺い、父子の道具共に符を付けさせた。よって半左衛門には遠慮を申し付け置いた。〇同二十一日、右審理の節御奉行御目付立会うが、月番は御用手透きの節に出向くべき旨である。〇同二十五日、同下代上野豊右衛門も審理。然るところ吉池角左衛門下代上野治左衛門という者が豊右衛門の兄弟で同居しているため、御法の通り両人共諸道具に符を付け、豊右衛門の諸道具を治左衛門に預け置いた。
一、享保十五年戌十二月十五日、御側物頭茂呂多右衛門組川瀬伴七の御切米手形について不届きの件があり、御家老中から御目付へ申し聞かされ、多右衛門方で審理するよう、則ち多右衛門が数度審理し口書数通を差し出したが、度々変わることもなく多右衛門も迷惑に存じ、御上で御審理下されるよう同役井原丞助を以って相願い、同二十五日町奉行大宮彦右衛門方で御奉行御目付一人ずつ立会いで審理するよう申し付けられた。これによって伴七は先格の通り半甲に剃り、多右衛門組の者を差し添えて彦右衛門方へ渡すべきかと伺った上で取り扱った。
一、同十七年子十二月二十六日 御先物頭小栗九右衛門へ
太田三郎兵衛方で失物があったため家来関助および町人権兵衛が疑わしいので上へ御取り上げ御評議下されるよう十一月十四日、その件も連々記録あり。以前相願ったため御評議が申し付けられ度々拷問等もあったが、右盗物の件は存じない趣である。然れども関助は御城下三里四方内には出向かないよう申し付けるべき旨を大宮彦右衛門へ申し付けた。権兵衛は当分子細もないため出牢申し付けるべき旨申し渡した。それについて三郎兵衛が右の証拠もない件を上へ相願い、右の通り強い御評議等も申し付けられた件、共に不審理な件を申し上げ、軽率な事を調べず不調法の仕合と思し召され、この段三郎兵衛へ申し聞かせるべき旨仰せ出された。
右について三郎兵衛の遠慮の件を伺うなら、きっと自分からの遠慮には及ばず、控えているよう九右衛門へ御内意の趣を申し聞かせ置いたところ、右仰せ渡しの内に御叱責というものもなく、関助の件について不審理不調法もいたし方もないと存じて遠慮伺いはしないと三郎兵衛が申した由、九右衛門が段々取り扱ったが承引しない、その段を御家老中へ申し達したところ、三郎兵衛は以ての外不了簡の件であるので縫殿方差図であるから遠慮伺いするよう申し聞かされ遠慮伺いした。なお九右衛門からの段々の次第を御目付へ申し達した記録詳細あり 右審理について御徒目付両人掛かりを申し付け置いたところ、二十六日御家老中へ伺いの上差し免じた。
ただし翌丑年正月十八日、三郎兵衛は御役御取り上げ大番入遠慮を申し付けられた。
一、文政十年亥二月十一日、加藤武右衛門組多田吉兵衛という者に御不審の件があり、組役人同道で御勘定所へ差し出すよう武右衛門へ申し達し、また武右衛門も同所へ出勤するよう申し達した。同日評定後九半時、吉兵衛を呼び出し御不審の趣を御徒目付および組分役共へ申し付けて審理させたところ口書を差し出したためその段を御家老中へ相達した。然るところ吉兵衛を揚り屋へ入れ置くよう申し聞かされたため武右衛門へ申し達し、町奉行手先の者が申し越し、それぞれ御徒目付へ申し付けて取り扱わせた。その節組の者両人を指し遣わす ただし右審理の節同役残らず居残り、物書共は月番の外残らず召し呼び、口書等を認めさせ読み聞かせることも申し付けた。同十三日、吉兵衛は御扶持を召し放たれ入牢。
【左上朱書き】イ
英語訳
They were ordered to dispatch [personnel], so Toda Shichibē and Ban Shōzaemon were sent out.
1. When there are deliberations regarding御預所 (shogunal direct territories), one inspector should attend according to the nature of the case. One foot inspector should do likewise. Mizutama
1. In the 2nd year of Kansei, year of the Dog, 11th month (1790), instructions were given to the district heads regarding the handover of persons under investigation. Although this appears in the punishment regulations section, it should be included here.
1. On the 16th day of the 2nd month of the 3rd year of Bunka, year of the Tiger (1806), there was a suspicious matter concerning Toyoda Saemon, who had previously served as deputy in the weapons department. He was summoned to the accounting office and examined by foot inspectors. Finding no discrepancies in his testimony, a memorandum was prepared and reported to the senior councillors. At that time, the foot inspectors were assigned to handle the matter respectively.
However, the aforementioned testimony memorandum was ordered to be written by a scribe from Jūdayū's group, and the foot inspectors read it aloud to Saemon.
When the aforementioned Saemon was to be confined to the detention house in Daiku-machi, it was conveyed to Nara Tarōemon that his subordinates should report respectively, and that four palanquin bearers should report immediately to the rotating village headman. Of course, two group members were sent as lookouts. Also, when Saemon was handed over to the town office, his personal effects, side sword, etc. were recorded in writing and handed to the town group official.
1. On the 16th day of the 8th month of the 4th year of Shōtoku, year of the Horse (1714), regarding the imperial edict matter that came from Kyoto to the metalworkers of Gobuichi village, there are continuous records of deliberations. On the 5th day of the 8th month of the 5th year of Shōtoku, year of the Sheep (1715), the metalworkers went to Kyoto, received the imperial edict this time, returned, and today the senior councillors examined it. All records of this case are continuously recorded in the council records.
1. On the 6th day of the 2nd month of the 11th year of Kyōhō, year of the Horse (1726), regarding the examination of Kondō Jingobē, a contract deputy under magistrate Yana Hachizaemon, he was confined to the accounting office quarters and seals were affixed to his household goods. However, since his father Kondō Hanzaemon, a lower guard of the rice storehouse, lived with him, and father and son had been living together from before, seals were affixed to both father and son's various tools, with sorting to be done later. This was reported to the senior councillors, and seals were affixed to both father and son's tools. Therefore, Hanzaemon was ordered to observe restraint. ○ On the same 21st day, magistrates and inspectors attended the aforementioned examination, but the monthly duty officer should attend when official duties permit. ○ On the same 25th day, the same deputy Ueno Toyoemon was also examined. However, since Ueno Jizaemon, deputy to Yoshiike Kakuzaemon, was Toyoemon's brother and lived with him, according to regulations, seals were affixed to both men's various tools, and Toyoemon's various tools were entrusted to Jizaemon.
1. On the 15th day of the 12th month of the 15th year of Kyōhō, year of the Dog (1730), there was a misconduct matter regarding Kawase Banshichi of senior attendant Moro Taemon's group concerning rice stipend certificates. The senior councillors instructed the inspectors that Taemon should conduct the examination. Taemon conducted multiple examinations and submitted several written testimonies, but with no changes occurring repeatedly, Taemon found it troublesome and requested through his colleague Ihara Jōsuke that the authorities conduct the examination. On the same 25th day, it was ordered that the examination be conducted at town magistrate Ōmiya Hikoemon's place with one magistrate and one inspector each attending. Accordingly, it was handled after inquiring whether Banshichi should have his topknot half-shaved according to precedent and be handed over to Hikoemon's place with Taemon's group members accompanying him.
1. On the 26th day of the 12th month of the 17th year, year of the Rat (1732) To senior ashigaru commander Oguri Kuemon:
Since there was a theft at Ōta Saburōbē's place, his retainer Kansuke and townsman Gonbē were suspicious, so a request was made on the 14th day of the 11th month for official investigation and deliberation, and there are continuous records of this matter. Since the request was made previously, deliberation was ordered and torture was applied multiple times, but they claimed not to know about the stolen goods. However, Kansuke was ordered not to appear within three or four ri of the castle town, as conveyed to Ōmiya Hikoemon. Gonbē was ordered to be released from prison as there were no particular issues at present. Regarding this, since Saburōbē had requested official action on a matter without evidence, and such strong deliberation was ordered, both the inadequate investigation and the rash, incompetent handling were considered regrettable, and it was announced that this should be conveyed to Saburōbē.
Regarding this, when asked about Saburōbē's restraint, the private instruction was conveyed to Kuemon that he need not impose self-restraint but should remain in reserve. However, since there was no official reprimand in the aforementioned announcement, and regarding Kansuke's matter, there was no choice about the inadequate investigation and incompetence, Saburōbē said he would not request restraint. Although Kuemon handled this matter repeatedly, [Saburōbē] would not agree, and when this was reported to the senior councillors, since Saburōbē's conduct was extremely unreasonable, he was told to request restraint as it was Nuinodono's instruction, so he requested restraint. Furthermore, the detailed records of Kuemon's reports to the inspectors exist. Regarding this investigation, two foot inspectors were assigned, but on the 26th day, they were relieved after consulting with the senior councillors.
However, on the 18th day of the 1st month of the following year of the Ox, Saburōbē was stripped of his official position and ordered to observe restraint while joining the ōban guard unit.
1. On the 11th day of the 2nd month of the 10th year of Bunsei, year of the Boar (1827), there was a suspicious matter concerning a person named Tada Kichibē of Katō Buemon's group. It was conveyed to Buemon that group officials should accompany him to the accounting office, and that Buemon should also report to the same place. On the same day, after the council meeting at half past nine, Kichibē was summoned and the suspicious matter was examined by foot inspectors and group officials, whereupon he submitted a written testimony, which was reported to the senior councillors. However, when it was announced that Kichibē should be confined to the detention house, this was conveyed to Buemon, and town magistrate agents were dispatched to handle the matter through foot inspectors. At that time, two group members were sent. However, during the aforementioned examination, all colleagues remained, and all scribes except the monthly duty officer were summoned to write testimonies and read them aloud. On the same 13th day, Kichibē's stipend was revoked and he was imprisoned.
[Red notation in upper left] A