翻刻
石垣筑地下地京ノ甚衛門入衛門ニ申付
四十八匁之石ハ面ハとがた石うらハ野石也此
所近比迄土居有之而ケヤ木大木有之然ニ
福氏拘之間ニ此惣ノ木ヲ伐取松下へ売渡
時西ハ川限ト証文ニ被載候由也北ノ境ノ石ゟ
縄ヲ引ハ一間モ西へ可寄申歟ト人々申アヘリ
先年山本町ノ今在家ノうら池ノ端吟味之
時既ニ家ヲキラセ被■然ニ此処不吟味ナラハ
向後自余ノ境吟味成間敷也請取置人渡人
如此サセ置社中アヤマリ無限事也
◦今日公儀へ供僧衆舎利供養之事訴訟ニ被出也
八日雨天 日供 内取神事如例
自伝 奏神主役者呼参候故保可 維久 保方
又供僧ノ安養院四人被罷出候 御対面仰云今
度舎利供養義堅可為停止之旨也御公儀へ
も申上候由被申上于時仰云先日訴訟時追付被
現代語訳
石垣・築地（の工事について）、下地（の作業）を京の甚衛門・入衛門に申し付けた。四十八匁の石は、表面はとがた石（角石）、裏は野石（粗削りの石）である。この場所は近ごろまで土居（土塁）があり、ケヤキの大木があった。しかし、福氏が（その土地を）抱えている間に、惣（総体の）木を伐り取り、松下へ売り渡した。その際、証文には「西は川を境とする」と記されていたとのことである。北の境の石から縄を引けば、一間ほど西へ寄るべきではないかと、人々が口々に言い合った。先年、山本町の今在家（現在の在家）の裏池の端について吟味した際には、すでに（境界を侵していた）家を切らせ（除去させ）た■（ことがあった）。しかしながら、この箇所を吟味しないままであれば、今後、その他の境界の吟味も成り立たなくなるであろう。（土地を）受け取った者・渡した者（の双方が）このようにさせておいた、社中の誤りは際限がないことである。
◦今日、公儀（幕府）へ供僧衆が舎利供養のことについて訴訟に出られた。
八日 雨天 日供 内取神事、例の通り。
（文書が）伝わるところによれば、奏（上申）の神主・役者が呼ばれて参上した。保可・維久・保方、また供僧の安養院（の者）四人が罷り出られた。御対面にて仰せられるには、「今度の舎利供養の義は、堅く停止とすべきである」とのことであった。御公儀へも申し上げたとのことを申し上げた。その時に仰せられるには、「先日の訴訟の時、追って（通達が）……」
英語訳
Regarding the stone wall and earthen wall (construction), the preparatory groundwork was assigned to Jinemon and Nyūemon of Kyoto. The stones costing 48 monme have dressed (cut) stone faces on the front and rough fieldstone on the back. Until recently, this location had an earthen embankment (doi) and large zelkova trees. However, during the period when the Fuku clan held control of the land, they felled all the trees and sold them to Matsushita. At that time, the written agreement stated that "the western boundary is the river." When a rope was stretched from the boundary stone to the north, people discussed amongst themselves that (the line) might well shift approximately one ken (approximately 1.8 meters) to the west. In a previous year, when an investigation was conducted regarding the edge of the rear pond at the present residence (ima-zaike) in Yamamoto-chō, the offending structures were already made to be removed [one character unclear]. However, if this location is left without investigation, future boundary disputes at other sites will become impossible to resolve. Both those who received the land and those who transferred it allowed this situation to continue—the errors within the shrine community are without limit.
◦ Today, the assembly of serving monks (gubu-sō) filed a lawsuit with the public authorities (the bakufu) regarding the matter of the relic offering ceremony (śarīra kuyō).
8th day. Rainy. Daily offerings (nichiku). The inner rite (uchitori shinjи) was performed as customary.
According to what has been transmitted: the shrine priests (kannagi) and performers (yakusha) in charge of submitting reports were summoned and appeared. Hoka, Korehisa, and Hokata were present, and four members of Anyō-in, the temple of the serving monks, also came forth. At the audience, it was declared: "The śarīra offering ceremony this time is to be strictly prohibited (teishi)." It was also reported that this had been communicated to the public authorities (the bakufu). At that time, it was further declared: "At the time of the lawsuit the other day, it was shortly thereafter [text continues on next page]…"