切支丹御退治記 49巻. [8] - 翻刻

翻刻

　八拾壱歳之老功故肥前国島原江被呼二月
　中旬に着陣せしか嫡子八右衛門者人質与し亭
　江戸に居多里て故次男万右衛門を召具し希　
　る歟廿七日彼万右衛門能働而打死す其家来
　七人一所に而討多類堂里
公程閑暇雑書曰島原一揆之節黒田筑前守
　殿一手之人数二月廿七日本丸江乗入候を御
　覧被成候而兄弟三人馬上に而松平伊豆守殿陣
　場江被行向伊豆守殿江被仰候者今度当地に而軍
　法之依怙不被成者有儀江府にお以亭被申間鋪

　与荒々敷被仰候伊豆守殿是者如何様之儀に而
　候成不存寄仰分との義也筑前殿被仰候者
　其儀に候先達而立花松倉両家之陣場此
　方江被相渡候得両人之衆江者何方に而茂仕　
　寄を付返し可申与申候得共御承引無浜之
　手を被相渡候其節申分義存寄候得共我所
　に阿ぐみ兎や角申様に而候間無異儀領掌
　申候細川越中守江両家之陣場を被相渡
　候得者某之望をは不相叶越中守望者不
　相叶候儀依怙に而無之候成惣而今度之一揆

現代語訳

八十一歳の老功により肥前国島原へ呼ばれ、二月中旬に着陣した。しかし嫡子八右衛門は人質として江戸に居るため、次男万右衛門を連れて行った。二十七日、その万右衛門は奮戦したが討ち死にした。その家来七人も一緒に討ち死にした。

『公程閑暇雑書』に曰く、島原一揆の節、黒田筑前守殿の一手の人数が二月二十七日に本丸へ乗り入ったのをご覧になって、兄弟三人が馬上にて松平伊豆守殿の陣場へ向かわれた。伊豆守殿に申されたのは「今度当地にて軍法の依怙贔屓をなさる者があれば、江戸の幕府に申し上げるつもりである」と荒々しく申された。伊豆守殿は「これはどのような儀でございましょうか、存じ寄らない仰せ分けのことです」と答えた。筑前殿が申されるには「その儀でございます。先達て立花・松倉両家の陣場をこちらに渡されましたが、両人の衆に対してはどちらでも仕寄せを付け返すと申しましたが、ご承引がなく、浜の手を渡されました。その節の申し分は心得ておりますが、我が所に阿（おもね）り、とやかく申すようでございますので、異議なく承知いたしました。細川越中守に両家の陣場を渡されましたならば、某の望みは叶わず、越中守の望みも叶わないということで、依怙贔屓ではございません。総じて今度の一揆は

英語訳

Due to his distinguished service at the age of eighty-one, he was summoned to Shimabara in Hizen Province and arrived at camp in mid-February. However, since his eldest son Hachiemon was in Edo as a hostage, he brought his second son Man'emon with him. On the 27th, that Man'emon fought valiantly but was killed in battle. Seven of his retainers also died together with him.

According to "Kōtei Kanka Zassho" (Miscellaneous Writings in Leisure Time): During the Shimabara Rebellion, when Lord Kuroda Chikuzen-no-kami's forces stormed into the main castle on February 27th, upon seeing this, three brothers on horseback went to the camp of Lord Matsudaira Izu-no-kami. What was said to Lord Izu-no-kami was roughly: "If there are those who show favoritism in military law at this place, I intend to report it to the shogunate in Edo." Lord Izu-no-kami replied, "What kind of matter might this be? This is an unexpected statement." Lord Chikuzen said: "That is the matter. Previously, when the camp positions of the Tachibana and Matsukura families were transferred to us, I said that we could return the siege works to either of the two families' forces, but there was no agreement, and the coastal position was transferred to us. I understood the reasoning at that time, but since it seemed like flattery to our position and there were various opinions, I accepted it without objection. If the positions of both families had been transferred to Hosokawa Etchū-no-kami, my wish would not be fulfilled, nor would Etchū-no-kami's wish be fulfilled, so this is not favoritism. Generally speaking, this rebellion